In the ever-expanding landscape of academic research, the ability to efficiently discover, analyze, and manage scholarly literature is paramount. Researchers are constantly seeking tools that can streamline their workflows, from initial literature discovery to final manuscript submission. Two prominent platforms in this space are Elicit and RefWorks. However, they approach the challenges of academic research from fundamentally different perspectives.
Elicit represents the new wave of AI Research Assistant tools, leveraging large language models to automate and accelerate the analysis and synthesis of scientific papers. In contrast, RefWorks is a well-established and trusted stalwart in the field of Citation Management, focusing on the meticulous organization of references and the seamless generation of citations and bibliographies.
This in-depth comparison will dissect the capabilities, user experiences, and ideal use cases for both Elicit and RefWorks. Our goal is to provide students, academics, and professional researchers with a clear understanding of which tool, or combination of tools, best suits their specific needs in the complex ecosystem of modern scholarship.
Elicit, developed by Ought, is not merely a search engine; it's an AI-powered platform designed to automate research workflows. Its core mission is to help researchers find relevant papers, extract key information, and synthesize findings at scale. Instead of relying on traditional keyword searches, users can ask a research question in natural language. Elicit then searches a vast corpus of academic papers and presents results in a structured, easy-to-digest format, often summarizing key takeaways and extracting data points directly from the papers into a table.
RefWorks, a product from ProQuest (part of Clarivate), is a classic web-based reference and citation management tool. For decades, it has been a go-to solution for researchers needing to collect, store, organize, and cite their sources. Its primary function is to serve as a centralized library for all your research materials. RefWorks excels at formatting citations in thousands of different styles and integrates directly with word processors to make the process of writing and citing as smooth as possible. It is often provided to users through institutional subscriptions via university libraries.
While both tools support the research lifecycle, their feature sets are specialized for different stages of the process. Elicit focuses on the "what should I read and what does it say?" part of research, while RefWorks handles the "how do I organize and cite what I've read?" part.
| Feature | Elicit | RefWorks |
|---|---|---|
| Literature Search | Uses semantic search based on natural language questions to find relevant papers. | Connects to hundreds of institutional databases for direct import; also supports manual entry and file uploads. |
| Data Extraction | Core feature. Automatically pulls key data, methodologies, outcomes, and other details from papers into a customizable table. | Stores abstracts and metadata but does not perform automated data extraction from the full text. |
| AI Summarization | Generates abstractive summaries of individual papers or synthesizes findings from a group of top papers related to a query. | No native AI summarization capabilities. |
| Citation Management | Basic functionality. Can export references in formats like BibTeX for import into other tools. | Core feature. Comprehensive management of thousands of citation styles, with advanced organization via folders and tags. |
| Word Processor Integration | No direct integration. The workflow involves exporting findings or references for use elsewhere. | Deep integration with Microsoft Word (Write-n-Cite) and Google Docs for in-line citation and automatic bibliography creation. |
| Collaboration | Allows sharing of specific workflows and results via a public link. | Enables sharing of folders and entire reference libraries with collaborators, allowing for team-based library management. |
A tool's power is often magnified by its ability to connect with other services. Here, the philosophies of Elicit and RefWorks diverge significantly.
Elicit is built with modern, data-centric workflows in mind. It provides:
RefWorks focuses on deep integration within the traditional academic ecosystem. It provides:
The user interface (UI) and user experience (UX) of each tool reflect its core purpose.
Elicit offers a clean, minimalist, and modern web interface. The experience is centered around a single action: asking a question. The results are presented in a dynamic, table-based view that encourages exploration and customization. The learning curve is remarkably low for its primary function, inviting users to dive in and start discovering relevant literature immediately. The focus is on speed to insight.
RefWorks presents a more traditional, database-style interface. It is powerful and dense with features for organizing, tagging, and managing references. While effective, new users may find the sheer number of options and panes slightly overwhelming. The UX is optimized for organization and meticulous management of a large reference library over a long period.
Both platforms provide robust resources to help users, but their support models differ.
Elicit relies heavily on a self-serve model with excellent documentation. Users can access a detailed Help Center, tutorials, and a community Discord server where they can interact with the Elicit team and other users. The support is agile and community-focused.
RefWorks benefits from its long-standing presence in academia and its backing by a major corporation. Support is often multi-layered:
To truly understand the difference, let's consider practical scenarios for each tool.
The ideal user for each platform is distinct, though there is some overlap.
Elicit operates on a freemium model.
RefWorks predominantly uses an institutional subscription model.
Alternatives to Elicit (AI Research Assistants):
Alternatives to RefWorks (Citation Managers):
Elicit and RefWorks are not direct competitors; rather, they are complementary tools that serve different, vital functions in the Academic Research lifecycle.
Elicit is a tool for discovery and analysis. It excels at the front end of the research process, helping you ask broad questions, synthesize vast amounts of information, and extract structured data quickly. It answers the question, "What does the literature say?"
RefWorks is a tool for organization and writing. It excels at the back end of the process, helping you manage a large library of sources and cite them perfectly as you write. It answers the question, "How do I manage and format my sources?"
Our Recommendations:
1. Can Elicit replace RefWorks completely?
No. Elicit is not designed to be a full-fledged citation manager. It lacks the advanced organizational features, vast style library, and direct word processor integration that are core to RefWorks' function.
2. Which tool is better for a graduate student writing a dissertation?
Both are incredibly useful. A graduate student should use Elicit in the initial stages to map out their field and conduct their literature review. They should then use RefWorks throughout the writing process to manage their hundreds of sources and generate their bibliography.
3. Is the data extracted by Elicit's AI reliable?
Elicit's AI is highly advanced, but as with any AI tool, it is not perfect. It is a powerful assistant, not a replacement for scholarly judgment. Researchers should always use the extracted information as a starting point and verify critical data points against the source papers, which Elicit makes easy to do.